Rev. Geoff McKee argues that the doctrine of a personal God is correct. In his sermon for 15 July 2018, his scripture is Ephesians 1:3-14 – part of the apostle Paul’s sermon to the church at Ephesus. Albert Einstein always had strong objections to the concept of a personal God. Geoff examines the competing ideas of free will and election/predestination, and explains how the words ‘In Christ’ are key to understanding the strength of the argument in favour of a personal God.
You can download a PDF version of the sermon by clicking here.
Ephesians 1:3-14 (New International Version)
Praise for Spiritual Blessings in Christ
3 Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in the heavenly realms with every spiritual blessing in Christ. 4 For he chose us in him before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight. In love 5 he predestined us for adoption to sonship through Jesus Christ, in accordance with his pleasure and will— 6 to the praise of his glorious grace, which he has freely given us in the One he loves. 7 In him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, in accordance with the riches of God’s grace 8 that he lavished on us. With all wisdom and understanding, 9 he made known to us the mystery of his will according to his good pleasure, which he purposed in Christ, 10 to be put into effect when the times reach their fulfillment—to bring unity to all things in heaven and on earth under Christ.11 In him we were also chosen, having been predestined according to the plan of him who works out everything in conformity with the purpose of his will, 12 in order that we, who were the first to put our hope in Christ, might be for the praise of his glory. 13 And you also were included in Christ when you heard the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation. When you believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit, 14 who is a deposit guaranteeing our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God’s possession—to the praise of his glory.
Albert Einstein gave grudging acceptance to “the necessity for a beginning”.
Eventually, he also accepted “the presence of a superior reasoning power.”
But never did he accept the doctrine of a personal God.
Two specific obstacles blocked his way.
According to his journal writings, Einstein wrestled
- with a deeply felt bitterness toward the clergy, toward priests in particular, and
- with his inability to resolve the paradox of God’s omnipotence and man’s responsibility for his choices.
“If this being is omnipotent, then every occurrence, including every human action, every human thought, and every human feeling and aspiration is also His work; how is it possible to think of holding men responsible for their deeds and thoughts before such an almighty being? In giving out punishment and rewards He would to a certain extent be passing judgment on Himself. How can this be combined with the goodness and righteousness ascribed to Him?”
Seeing no solution to this paradox, Einstein, like many other powerful intellects through the centuries, ruled out the existence of a personal God.
The story is told of a group of theologians who were discussing the tension between predestination and free will.
Things became so heated that the group broke up into two opposing factions.
But one man, not knowing which to join, stood for a moment trying to decide.
At last, he joined the predestination group.
“Who sent you here?” they asked.
“No one sent me,” he replied. “I came of my own free will.”
“Free will!” they exclaimed. “You can’t join us! You belong with the other group!”
So he followed their orders and went to the other clique.
There, someone asked, “When did you decide to join us?”
The young man replied, “Well, I didn’t really decide–I was sent here.”
“Sent here!” they shouted. “You can’t join us unless you have decided by your own free will!”
Such are the tangles we are capable of getting ourselves in as we receive in so many different ways the beautiful doctrine of election that is presented to us in the passage from Ephesians.
It is sometimes called the doctrine of predestination.
The conundrum that Albert Einstein articulated has come to dominate discussion of the teaching. I would like to suggest to you today that a failure to read the text that is in front of us, for what it is, has caused the problem. [Read more…]