Lossiemouth Church of Scotland

Will we be a stumbling block or a stepping stone? Mark 9:38-50 is Rev. Geoff McKee’s scripture for 30 September 2018 (Nineteenth Sunday after Pentecost). ‘Whoever is not against us is for us’, says Jesus. Christians must get out of their own way and not prevent anyone from coming to Jesus. In a sermon which includes reference to the film Mask and to The Elephant Man, Geoff explains that it is in the Christian’s response to the stranger that we see how closely we are following Jesus’ teachings.

You can download a PDF version of the sermon by clicking here.

Mark 9:38-50 (New International Version)

Whoever Is Not Against Us Is for Us
38 “Teacher,” said John, “we saw someone driving out demons in your name and we told him to stop, because he was not one of us.”

39 “Do not stop him,” Jesus said. “For no one who does a miracle in my name can in the next moment say anything bad about me, 40 for whoever is not against us is for us. 41 Truly I tell you, anyone who gives you a cup of water in my name because you belong to the Messiah will certainly not lose their reward.

Causing to Stumble
42 “If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble, it would be better for them if a large millstone were hung around their neck and they were thrown into the sea. 43 If your hand causes you to stumble, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life maimed than with two hands to go into hell, where the fire never goes out.  45 And if your foot causes you to stumble, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life crippled than to have two feet and be thrown into hell.  47 And if your eye causes you to stumble, pluck it out. It is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye than to have two eyes and be thrown into hell, 48 where

“‘the worms that eat them do not die,
and the fire is not quenched.’

49 Everyone will be salted with fire.

50 “Salt is good, but if it loses its saltiness, how can you make it salty again? Have salt among yourselves, and be at peace with each other.”

“Isn’t it strange that princes and kings
And clowns that caper in sawdust rings
And common folk like you and me
Are the builders of eternity.
To each is given a bag of tools,
A shapeless mass and a book of rules;
And each must make, ere time is flown,
A stumbling-block or a stepping-stone.”

The Gospel text today is all about the challenge to the followers of Jesus.

• Will you make stumbling-blocks or stepping stones?
• What should the church be about?
• Should it be concerned about keeping the impure out?

These questions are somewhat obscured by the extreme imagery that we encounter in the text.

Talk of exorcism and hell does not sit easily with a twenty-first century western congregation who have particular – and maybe even acute – doubts about all of it.

We may wonder why the hell imagery is here in a passage dealing primarily with the boundary markers of the believing community. There is no doubt that Christian beliefs about hell have been sources of division and exclusion throughout the history of the church and most particularly in the modern era. [Read more…]

In his sermon for 23 September 2018, Rev. Geoff McKee discusses Mark 9:30-37 by reference to C.S. Lewis’ allegorical children’s story, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, highlighting how Jesus was not the Messiah the disciples expected, how this made them feel “not safe” with Jesus and how, as Christians, we must resist our instinctive reactions – why we must not let fear drive us to self-protection.

You can download a PDF version of the sermon by clicking here.

Mark 9:30-37 (New International Version)

Jesus Predicts His Death a Second Time
30 They left that place and passed through Galilee. Jesus did not want anyone to know where they were, 31 because he was teaching his disciples. He said to them, “The Son of Man is going to be delivered into the hands of men. They will kill him, and after three days he will rise.”32 But they did not understand what he meant and were afraid to ask him about it.

33 They came to Capernaum. When he was in the house, he asked them, “What were you arguing about on the road?” 34 But they kept quiet because on the way they had argued about who was the greatest.

35 Sitting down, Jesus called the Twelve and said, “Anyone who wants to be first must be the very last, and the servant of all.”

36 He took a little child whom he placed among them. Taking the child in his arms, he said to them, 37 “Whoever welcomes one of these little children in my name welcomes me; and whoever welcomes me does not welcome me but the one who sent me.”

C.S. Lewis’ celebrated children’s book, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, tells of the adventures of four children in the magical kingdom of Narnia.

The story is fun, but it’s also an allegory of Christ and salvation, with Christ represented by the lion Aslan.

When in Narnia, the children meet Mr and Mrs Beaver, who describe the mighty lion to them.

“Is he a man?” asked Lucy.

“Aslan a man!” said Mr Beaver sternly. “Certainly not. I tell you he is King of the wood and the son of the great emperor-beyond-the-sea. Don’t you know who is the King of the Beasts? Aslan is a lion – the Lion, the great lion.”

“Oh!” said Susan, “I’d thought he was a man. Is he – quite safe? I shall feel rather nervous about meeting a lion.”

“That you will, dearie, and no mistake” said Mrs Beaver; “if there’s anyone who can appear before Aslan without their knees knocking, they’re either braver than most or else just silly.”

“Then he isn’t safe?” said Lucy.

“Safe?” said Mr Beaver; “don’t you hear what Mrs Beaver tells you? Who said anything about safe? ‘Course he isn’t safe. But he’s good. He’s the King, I tell you.”

The disciples were discovering that Jesus was far from safe.

In fact, they were beginning to become a bit afraid of him. [Read more…]

This is Rev. Geoff McKee’s sermon for 16 September 2018, based on Mark 8:27-38 in which Peter declares that Jesus is the Messiah but misunderstands how that will play out in practice.

You can download a PDF version of the sermon by clicking here.

Mark 8:27-38 (New International Version)

Peter Declares That Jesus Is the Messiah

27 Jesus and his disciples went on to the villages around Caesarea Philippi. On the way he asked them, “Who do people say I am?” 28 They replied, “Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, one of the prophets.” 29 “But what about you?” he asked. “Who do you say I am?” Peter answered, “You are the Messiah.” 30 Jesus warned them not to tell anyone about him.

Jesus Predicts His Death

31 He then began to teach them that the Son of Man must suffer many things and be rejected by the elders, the chief priests and the teachers of the law, and that he must be killed and after three days rise again. 32 He spoke plainly about this, and Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him. 33 But when Jesus turned and looked at his disciples, he rebuked Peter. “Get behind me, Satan!” he said. “You do not have in mind the concerns of God, but merely human concerns.”

The Way of the Cross

34 Then he called the crowd to him along with his disciples and said: “Whoever wants to be my disciple must deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me. 35 For whoever wants to save their life will lose it, but whoever loses their life for me and for the gospel will save it. 36 What good is it for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? 37 Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul? 38 If anyone is ashamed of me and my words in this adulterous and sinful generation, the Son of Man will be ashamed of them when he comes in his Father’s glory with the holy angels.”

Annie and I managed to get down to Edinburgh for a couple of nights last month and when we were there we went to the Scottish National Gallery where there is an exhibition of some of Rembrandt’s paintings on display at the moment.

It’s very impressive; even for someone like me who doesn’t know an awful lot about the visual arts.

It was explained in the presentation to the exhibition that Rembrandt specialised in the selfie!

Throughout his life he painted himself and so it’s fascinating, in an era long before the photographic camera, to view a changing face through the years as age began to take its toll.

One of the paintings on display is The Three Crosses and this contains one of Rembrandt’s most telling selfies. If you were to look at Rembrandt’s painting of The Three Crosses, your attention would be drawn first to the centre cross on which Jesus died. Then, as you would look at the crowd gathered around the foot of that cross, you’d be impressed by the various facial expressions and actions of the people involved in the awful crime of crucifying Jesus. Finally, your eyes would drift to the edge of the painting and catch sight of another figure, almost hidden in the shadows.

Art critics believe this is a representation of Rembrandt himself, for he recognised his responsibility, as a human being, for Jesus ending up on the cross.

The Gospel reading today should be a profoundly shocking one.

But it has largely lost its force to shock through a kind of indoctrination.

And that’s shocking in itself.

Peter was asked a question by Jesus and he got the answer right, only for Jesus to point out to him that Peter hadn’t understood the answer he had just given him.

The events took place in the villages of Caesaria Philippi. That’s the physical context which actually informs the political context – whether Peter was aware of that or not. Caesaria Philippi was the northern stronghold of Roman power and control in Palestine.

When Peter answered Jesus’ question with – you are the Messiah – he was effectively stating that Jesus was to be the liberator, the one who would proceed to take the Roman occupiers on and get rid of them from the land.

Messiah was a political concept.

The Messiah, the anointed one of God, would reign as God’s representative at Zion and the foreign oppressor would be no more.

For Peter, Messiah was all about triumph and success.

Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the German theologian wrote: “The figure of the Crucified invalidates all thought which takes success for its standard.”

Peter would begin to learn that particular truth through the harsh words that Jesus directed towards him.

The right answer to the question is not sufficient without an understanding of its meaning and that strikes right to the heart of the issue in this passage and has implications for us today.

Peter could not understand why his Messiah should, in any sense, have to suffer anything.

Yes, it may be the case that in the fight with the Romans he may take an occasional blow but that may be avoided! After all, what’s the sense in suffering for suffering’s sake?

And, what’s more, no more of this talk of Jesus’ followers having to suffer too.

If news like that gets out no-one will want to follow this Messiah anywhere. No, let’s be sensible – let’s be reasonable.

Poor Peter – we may nod to ourselves knowingly. After all, we may be aware through years of teaching, why Jesus had to suffer. It’s obvious, isn’t it? God’s judgement and God’s mercy need to be satisfied and exercised and in the giving of the perfect Christ the debt of humankind is paid and the mercy of God in the provision of such a solution is demonstrated.

The Cross in this sense is a necessity and lots of theological detail has filled in the frame of this kind of argument over the years to the extent that we receive it, often without questioning it.

But note how quiet the text is regarding the reasons. It simply states that he must undergo great suffering – he must. But what does that mean?

Our doctrine can be indoctrinating if it prevents us from asking questions.

We must always feel free to question – to probe and to analyse and to seek to discern the truth.

For so long the church has settled on a divine punishment / divine mercy meeting place in Christ and we accept that without questioning, and with the acceptance, I would suggest to you, the scandal of Peter’s confession is lost.

You see, the point Jesus was making to Peter through this critical moment was that humanity did not need a political saviour.

Humanity needs a God who must endure the depth of human pain in order that humanity may be reconciled to God.

There is no hint here of an external negotiation between judgement and mercy but of an intrinsic necessity; the outworking of God’s decision to enter into and to reclaim the whole of human existence.

Dwight Morrow, the father of Anne Morrow Lindbergh, once held a dinner party to which Calvin Coolidge had been invited. After Coolidge left, Morrow told the remaining guests that Coolidge would make a good president.

The others disagreed. They felt Coolidge was too quiet, that he lacked colour and personality. No one would like him, they said.

Anne, then age six, spoke up: “I like him,” she said. Then she displayed a finger with a small bandage around it. “He was the only one at the party who asked about my sore finger.”

“That’s why he would make a good president,” added Morrow.

The cult of personality was of no interest whatsoever to Jesus.

It was his compassion and feeling for his people, for the world, that marked him out as Messiah and that was the scandal to a people looking for a mighty deliverer.

May we be saved from the indoctrination of providing the right answer without an awareness of the profound challenge of ‘God with us’. For that is the true scandal of the Messiah.

C.S. Lewis wrote:

“Lying at your feet is your dog. Imagine, for the moment, that your dog and every dog is in deep distress. Some of us love dogs very much. If it would help all the dogs in the world to become like men, would you be willing to become a dog? Would you put down your human nature, leave your loved ones, your job, hobbies, your art and literature and music, and choose instead of the intimate communion with your beloved, the poor substitute of looking into the beloved’s face and wagging your tail, unable to smile or speak? Christ by becoming man limited the thing which to Him was the most precious thing in the world; his unhampered, unhindered communion with the Father.”

It is from there that our humanity is reclaimed for God. And that must be our way too.

It is in our self-limiting that we find the way of God before us.

All of this is, of course, a great scandal, but it is the only way in which we can live faithfully as followers.

May God enable us to do so faithfully.

In this third of three sermons on Stewardship issues (09 September 2018), Rev. Geoff McKee looks again at 2 Corinthians 8:1-7 and also at Mark 6:31-44 (The Feeding of the Five Thousand). Having covered – in the two previous sermons – the misconceptions that only people with money should give and that it is unpleasant to give, this week he explodes the myth that giving results in a lack of resources.

Click here to download a PDF version of this sermon.

You can access the two previous sermons here (“only people with money should give”) and here (“it is unpleasant to give”).

2 Corinthians 8:1-7 (New International Version)
The Collection for the Lord’s People
8 And now, brothers and sisters, we want you to know about the grace that God has given the Macedonian churches. 2 In the midst of a very severe trial, their overflowing joy and their extreme poverty welled up in rich generosity. 3 For I testify that they gave as much as they were able, and even beyond their ability. Entirely on their own, 4 they urgently pleaded with us for the privilege of sharing in this service to the Lord’s people. 5 And they exceeded our expectations: They gave themselves first of all to the Lord, and then by the will of God also to us. 6 So we urged Titus, just as he had earlier made a beginning, to bring also to completion this act of grace on your part. 7 But since you excel in everything—in faith, in speech, in knowledge, in complete earnestness and in the love we have kindled in you—see that you also excel in this grace of giving.

Mark 6:31-44 (New International Version)
31 Then, because so many people were coming and going that they did not even have a chance to eat, he said to them, “Come with me by yourselves to a quiet place and get some rest.”

32 So they went away by themselves in a boat to a solitary place. 33 But many who saw them leaving recognised them and ran on foot from all the towns and got there ahead of them. 34 When Jesus landed and saw a large crowd, he had compassion on them, because they were like sheep without a shepherd. So he began teaching them many things.

35 By this time it was late in the day, so his disciples came to him. “This is a remote place,” they said, “and it’s already very late. 36 Send the people away so that they can go to the surrounding countryside and villages and buy themselves something to eat.”

37 But he answered, “You give them something to eat.”

They said to him, “That would take more than half a year’s wages! Are we to go and spend that much on bread and give it to them to eat?”

38 “How many loaves do you have?” he asked. “Go and see.”

When they found out, they said, “Five—and two fish.”

39 Then Jesus directed them to have all the people sit down in groups on the green grass. 40 So they sat down in groups of hundreds and fifties. 41 Taking the five loaves and the two fish and looking up to heaven, he gave thanks and broke the loaves. Then he gave them to his disciples to distribute to the people. He also divided the two fish among them all. 42 They all ate and were satisfied, 43 and the disciples picked up twelve basketfuls of broken pieces of bread and fish. 44 The number of the men who had eaten was five thousand.

Martin Luther, the great German reformer, wrote: “I have tried to keep things in my hands and lost them all, but what I have given into God’s hands I still possess.”

Some fear that, if you give away, you will not have enough left for yourself.

But it is a myth to say that giving results in a lack of resources.

Some of us never add the supernatural into the so-called economic realities of life. [Read more…]